AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |
Back to Blog
Getting banne dfor screenie8/4/2023 When a password is changed or reset for any user in an Azure AD tenant, the current version of the global banned password list is used to validate the strength of the password. The contents of the global banned password list aren't based on any external data source, but on the results of Azure AD security telemetry and analysis. When weak terms are found, they're added to the global banned password list. Specifically, the analysis looks for base terms that often are used as the basis for weak passwords. The Azure AD Identity Protection team constantly analyzes Azure AD security telemetry data looking for commonly used weak or compromised passwords. If your IT team hasn't enabled the ability to reset your own password, reach out to your helpdesk for additional assistance. If you're an end user already registered for self-service password reset and need to get back into your account, go to. This conceptual article explains to an administrator how Azure AD Password Protection works. For more information on using multiple layers of security for your sign-in events, see Your Pa$$word doesn't matter. You should use additional features like Azure AD Multi-Factor Authentication, not just rely on strong passwords enforced by Azure AD Password Protection. When users change or reset their passwords, these banned password lists are checked to enforce the use of strong passwords. To support your own business and security needs, you can define entries in a custom banned password list. With Azure AD Password Protection, default global banned password lists are automatically applied to all users in an Azure AD tenant. Azure AD Password Protection detects and blocks known weak passwords and their variants, and can also block additional weak terms that are specific to your organization. You can provide your users with guidance on how to choose passwords, but weak or insecure passwords are often still used. I'd be far more worried about my son using apps that originate in China that collect data than I am about him playing Mario Kart.A lot of security guidance recommends that you don't use the same password in multiple places, to make it complex, and to avoid simple passwords like Password123. "China has a rotten record in technology in general. "I don't think governments really have a place in telling parents how their children should be spending their time," Gural-Maiello said. Michael Gural-Maiello, who works in business development at an engineering firm and has an 11-year-old son, believes parents should be the ones regulating their children's video game use. "You're still saying 'Play video games,' but you're just setting limits." She added, partially joking: "Can they come here and impose that restriction on my house?" "I think the Chinese rules are good," Weiss said. Shira Weiss, a New Jersey-based publicist for technology clients including a video game company, sees value in the games that help keep her twin 12-year-old sons connected to their peers, but wants to better limit how often they play the more violent games. And some populations, such as students with disabilities, may benefit from the social interactions provided by video games. The ban doesn't address social media use, which is thought to be especially harmful for girls. Yet Morgan says negative associations with screen time are particularly evident for heavy users, possibly due to displacing activities like exercise or sleep. "It's really hard to get kids away from them." "These electronic devices are ubiquitous," Morgan said. Paul Morgan, a father of two teenagers and Penn State professor who studies electronic device use, sees flaws in the ban while acknowledging the challenge of controlling children's screen time. And I do think it would be a lot easier to turn it off if it wasn't just arguing with Mommy, but actually saying 'Well, the police said so.'"įor Duttweiler and many families outside of China, Monday's news of the country's strict social intervention - which regulators said was needed to stop a growing addiction to what it once described as "spiritual opium" - underscores a challenge to rein in video game use in their own homes, particularly during the pandemic.Ĭhina's regulator said the new rules were a response to growing concern that games affected the physical and mental health of children, a fear echoed by parents and experts in the United States. "On the other hand, it's not particularly good for kids to play as much as even my own children play. Register now for FREE unlimited access to Register
0 Comments
Read More
Leave a Reply. |